This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: gfortran regressions?
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: "Christopher D. Rickett" <crickett at lanl dot gov>
- Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:49:10 -0700
- Subject: Re: gfortran regressions?
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707021624170.25649@lennox.lanl.gov>
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 04:27:34PM -0600, Christopher D. Rickett wrote:
> hi all,
>
> i'm seeing failures in gfortran.dg/data_initialized_2.f90 and
> gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/pr32417.f90 on x86. my trunk does have
> modifications to symbol.c to fix the bug found by Steve this morning, but
> they don't seem to affect these -- if i remove my changes i know that the
> data_initialized_2.f90 still fails, but i didn't try the other w/o my
> changes.
>
gfortran.dg/data_initialized_2.f90 is a known failure. It's
been failing for me for a few weeks. pr32417.f90 is a new test
and it would fail if you don't have Danny Berlin's patch from
Sunday. Make sure you have an update version of tree-ssa-sccvn.c.
If it's still fails, report the info in testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.log.
PS: Send the patch to fortran@ and gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org. I'll
take care of it.
--
Steve