This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: ISO C Binding has been committed.


i've updated the gen_cptr_param function and now gfortran reports the following for your code:

kargl_1.f03:2.42:

  use iso_c_binding, only: c_f_procpointer
                                         1
Error: Type 'C_FUNPTR' required for ISO_C_BINDING function at (1)
kargl_1.f03:2.42:

use iso_c_binding, only: c_f_procpointer
1
Error: The derived type 'cptr' at (1) is of type 'c_funptr', which has not been defined



acceptable? if so, i'll apply it to trunk and bootstrap, regtest, and submit.


thanks.
Chris


On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Steve Kargl wrote:


On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 10:57:48AM -0600, Christopher D. Rickett wrote:
i would also like to say thanks to all those who've helped me get this
patch finished by helping with testing, cleanup, debugging, etc.

Chris


You have your first bug report. :-)


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32579

It seems kind of odd to me that someone would
use only C_F_PROCPOINTER in a module when its
first argument is of type C_PTR.  But, I checked Section
15 and could not find anything that says that C_PTR
is a constraint on C_F_PROCPOINTER.

MODULE X
 USE ISO_C_BINDING, ONLY : C_F_PROCPOINTER
END MODULE X

troutmask:kargl[207] ~/../sgk/work/4x/bin/gfortran -c a.f90
a.f90:2.43:

 USE ISO_C_BINDING, ONLY : C_F_PROCPOINTER
                                         1
Error: Type 'C_PTR' required for ISO_C_BINDING function at (1)
a.f90:2.43:

 USE ISO_C_BINDING, ONLY : C_F_PROCPOINTER
                                         1
Error: The derived type 'cptr' at (1) is of type 'c_ptr', which has not been defined


-- Steve



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]