This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: Fortran regressions
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: Brooks Moses <brooks dot moses at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 21:12:05 -0700
- Subject: Re: Fortran regressions
- References: <4aca3dc20706301936q497031e7vdc02f7be064bb470@mail.gmail.com> <468724C5.7040701@codesourcery.com>
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 08:51:33PM -0700, Brooks Moses wrote:
> I'm cc'ing this to the fortran@ list, as many of the Fortran developers
> don't read the main GCC lists.
>
> Thanks for mentioning this!
> - Brooks
>
> Daniel Berlin wrote:
> >Apparently there are some fortran regressions caused by my patch.
> >
> >The last time I modified the patch (which was before the freeze), I
> >did a test of C, C++, Fortran, objc.
> >
> >After the freeze ended, I did an svn update in that tree, bootstrapped
> >and regtested c/c++, and committed it.
> >
> >Other than the long span of time between the two, this is, AFAIK,
> >normal for most developers.
> >
> >I am working on finding and fixing the fortran regressions.
> >Hopefully it will be obvious what is wrong.
> >If it is not, I will happily revert the PRE changes until they are
> >fixed, so life can continue.
> >
Brooks, this well known to at least jerryd and myself. There
was a spirited exchange on IRC. I, for one, was extremely
frustrated.
PS: How's the thesis going? (I was in your position once).
--
Steve