Re: [Fortran-Experiments]: patch

["Christopher D. Rickett" <crickett at lanl dot gov>]

On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Tobias Burnus wrote:

> Hi Chris,
>
> Christopher D. Rickett wrote:
> > > - nested interfaces do not work yet,
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-02/msg00535.html
> > did you apply your proposed patch for bind(c) dummy procedures?
> Yes, I applied the big patch.

does that include your addition to check_conflict to allow dummy 
procedures to have bind(c)?

> > we could further improve this by adding some sort of character that is
> > invalid for C names just to ensure the C programmer can't call it by
> > it's mangled name either.
> I don't think that is needed.

also, i wanted comments about binding labels in general.  right now, i 
only consider the binding label field if the symbol is BIND(C) or from the 
iso_c_binding module.  however, if the compiler wants to assign a binding 
label w/o being either of these, then i can simply consider the binding 
label if it's non-null.  this should easily allow setting of binding 
labels for library routines.  does anyone have objections or comments?

Chris