This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: Extra swapping when using gfortran 4.3-20061224 vs gfortran 4.2-20061211
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
- Cc: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:52:55 -0800
- Subject: Re: Extra swapping when using gfortran 4.3-20061224 vs gfortran 4.2-20061211
- References: <45915EAB.7010605@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <45DDE4D8.5040407@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 07:45:44PM +0100, Toon Moene wrote:
>
> The result is: No swapping for the 7.0 version of HIRLAM *with both
> compilers*:
>
(snip)
>
> The picture is completely different for the HIRLAM version 7.1beta2:
>
(snip)
> So the conclusion is: MEM-SSA doesn't lead to memory bloat. The test
> results from 26 December last year must point to *another* difference
> between the tested compilers (gfortran 4.3-20061224 vs. gfortran
> 4.2-20061211).
I'm not sure I understand your conclusion. Your testing 2 different
versions of HIRLAM without telling us the difference between the
versions, and this is somehow a gfortran problem?
--
Steve