This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [Fortran-Experiments] Merge to r120360
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 08:31:18PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Steve Kargl wrote:
> >>> You mean the cleanup patch,
> >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-02/msg00440.html ?
> >>>
> >> that message refers to the correct patch, yes. i didn't know that it had
> >> been applied to the fortran-experiments branch yet. if it has been
> >> committed, then i'll send in another patch (much smaller; only ~140
> >> lines).
> >>
> As I can still patch the branch it means that they have not been committed.
>
> > Tobias, I have committed Chris' recent patches. I believe there
Whoops. s/have/have not/
I'm trying to multitask at the moment without much success.
> > are two that need to be committed.
> >
> Yes, the big one: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-02/msg00440.html
> which still cleanly applies and a tiny one which does not:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-02/msg00135.html
>
> > Can you check those in before continuing the merge?
> >
> May I interpret this such that they are approved for check in?
> If yes then I will commit them.
Yes. Of course, you may want to give it a build/regression test.
>From a quick scan of the patches, it looks as if Chris is simply
tying up some loose ends and fixing style issues. If something
breaks, we can also point at Chris. :-)
--
Steve