This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: Extra swapping when using gfortran 4.3-20061224 vs gfortran 4.2-20061211
- From: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
- To: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
- Cc: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:33:59 +0100
- Subject: Re: Extra swapping when using gfortran 4.3-20061224 vs gfortran 4.2-20061211
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=gwRqNiC/OdUJLLMfk/5MbrQcjX1igIenxF1rHWcwOqM+1lqaQCFP/KwQVksYdqjf0KnjRZDm19Zn8DMJqajzWUoRchR0zz08pM6kXnEw7acUIlr13hEpUXi6d7h2i8a6H4dbhPoh3n5VaE4eNEdFnDcLWKbs1+8YYIocqyG46HA=
- References: <45915EAB.7010605@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
Is something changed in the buffering of output, or is there
another change in handling of temporary arrays that could explain
this phenomenon ?
For unformatted data, that could be the new record marker scheme,
couldn't it?
FX