This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Two of Eef's bugs, was: Re: gfortran

From: Thomas Koenig <Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
Cc: Tobias Schl?ter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>, Eef van Beveren <eef at teor dot fis dot uc dot pt>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:27:43 +0100
Subject: Re: Two of Eef's bugs, was: Re: gfortran
References: <1166712693.2965.20.camel@lombok.fisica> <20061222161920.y0u90ap5w0g8k844@webmail.physik.uni-muenchen.de> <20061222172012.GA10922@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 09:20:12AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:

>    "Integer output constants are produced with the effect of
>     an Iw edit descriptor."
>     ...
>    "For numeric output, reasonable processor-dependent values
>     of w, d, and e are used for each of the numeric constants
>     output."

In this case, we could make the default format for list-directed
output of integers '(" ",I0)'.

> 
> For portable code, Eef needs to determine the processor-dependent
> value for w.

I don't think w has to be the same value for all constants.  It
would probably be best to use a format that cannot overflow
the substring, such as

    write (unit=c(1:5),fmt='(I5)') i

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Two of Eef's bugs, was: Re: gfortran
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: Two of Eef's bugs, was: Re: gfortran
  - From: Tobias Schlüter

References:
- gfortran
  - From: Eef van Beveren
- Two of Eef's bugs, was: Re: gfortran
  - From: Tobias Schlüter
- Re: Two of Eef's bugs, was: Re: gfortran
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]