This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [fortran PATCH] Minor ALLOCATE translation improvements

From: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
To: roger at eyesopen dot com
Cc: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:13:10 +0100
Subject: Re: [fortran PATCH] Minor ALLOCATE translation improvements
References: <4568.208.41.78.162.1166463384.squirrel@mail.eyesopen.com> <20061219010816.GA45580@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4479.68.35.10.103.1166493322.squirrel@mail.eyesopen.com> <20061219055410.GA64622@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <6265.68.35.10.103.1166726633.squirrel@mail.eyesopen.com>

roger

OK for mainline?

OK of course.

Thanks

implement the loops. Effectively, outlining "x = 0" in these cases. Presumably, stride==1 is typical in real code/benchmarks, and we only call this function if the array already has/needs a descriptor.

I would have thought so.

Paul

References:
- [fortran PATCH] Implement a(:,:) = 0.0 using memset
  - From: roger
- Re: [fortran PATCH] Implement a(:,:) = 0.0 using memset
  - From: Steve Kargl
- [fortran PATCH] Implement a(:,:) = 0.0 using memset (take 2)
  - From: roger
- Re: [fortran PATCH] Implement a(:,:) = 0.0 using memset (take 2)
  - From: Steve Kargl
- [fortran PATCH] Minor ALLOCATE translation improvements
  - From: roger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]