Re: [gfortran, testsuite] Fix bounds checking for substrings, enable bounds chekcing in dg testsuite, assorted fixes

[Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>]

On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:05:22PM +0100, Tobias Schl?ter wrote:
> Tobias Schl?ter <tobias.schlueter@physik.uni-muenchen.de> wrote on  
> Sat, 25 Nov 2006:
> >The list of options that we cycle through with this patch is:
> >    set TORTURE_OPTIONS [list \
> >        { -O0 } { -O1 } { -O2 } \
> >        { -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions } \
> >        { -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops } \
> >        { -O2 -fbounds-check } \
> >        { -O2 -fno-repack-arrays } \
> >        { -O3 -g } \
> >        { -Os }]
> >while previously, the dg testsuite would cycle through the following list
> >        { -O0 } \
> >        { -O1 } \
> >        { -O2 } \
> >        { -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer } \
> >        { -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops } \
> >        { -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions } 
> >        \
> >        { -O3 -g } \
> >        { -Os }
> >
> >This is a good time to speak up if you think that list is too long,
> >your favorite option is missing, etc.  I'm open to suggestions how to
> >shorten this list, as in its current incarnation the patch will grow
> >the list of options by 12.5%
> 
> Since PR30003 is about to be fixed, I'd like to bring this question  
> back to the front.  What options would we liek the testsuite to cycle  
> through.  According to FX' suggestion, I replaced -fno-repack-arrays  
> by -ftree-vectorize in my local tree.  Are you ok with cycling through  
> one more option, or would you rather see somethign cropped from the  
> list?
> 

What is the value of "-O3 -g"?  For the testsuite, I think we should
drop the "-g".

-- 
Steve