This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: option to check that arguments to PACK conform?

From: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
To: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
Cc: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>, Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>, Vivek Rao <vivekrao4 at yahoo dot com>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 09:02:05 +0100
Subject: Re: option to check that arguments to PACK conform?
References: <20061108191008.55101.qmail@web53404.mail.yahoo.com> <455245D1.6020806@net-b.de> <20061108214001.GA91215@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4554C393.4060408@wanadoo.fr> <20061110184549.GA76233@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4554DB2E.6040309@wanadoo.fr>

Are you proposing that in the presence of checking that
the frontend should emit a new function such that

x = reshape(y,z)

becomes

  check_bounds(x, y, z)
  x = reshape(y,z)

Yes; using tree-ssa to accomplish it.

This is probably the best way to do it, so go for it!

FX

Follow-Ups:
- Re: option to check that arguments to PACK conform?
  - From: Tobias Burnus

References:
- option to check that arguments to PACK conform?
  - From: Vivek Rao
- Re: option to check that arguments to PACK conform?
  - From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: option to check that arguments to PACK conform?
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: option to check that arguments to PACK conform?
  - From: Paul Thomas
- Re: option to check that arguments to PACK conform?
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: option to check that arguments to PACK conform?
  - From: Paul Thomas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]