This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: RFC on not documenting -fpreprocessed, -fmodule-private options.
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: Brooks Moses <brooks dot moses at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:18:11 -0800
- Subject: Re: RFC on not documenting -fpreprocessed, -fmodule-private options.
- References: <45539460.7080004@codesourcery.com> <4554D92B.2050009@codesourcery.com>
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:55:23AM -0800, Brooks Moses wrote:
>
> On the other hand, I'm not sure it does what I think it does, at least
> from an end-user perspective -- given a file that's the output of a
> preprocessor, the error messages refer to the original file and line
> number regardless of whether -fpreprocessed is given. But it does turn
> off preprocessor directives on .F90 files.
>
> Since that does no more and no less than what's described in gcc.pdf
> under "preprocessor directives", I don't see a need to copy that
> documentation into gfortran.pdf, but I'll be glad to do it if there are
> objections to that idea.
>
You can always document by "-fpreprocessed -- See the GCC manual".
--
Steve