This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Emacs and GFortran

From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams at gnu dot org>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
Cc: wt at atmos dot colostate dot edu, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, emacs-devel at gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 00:35:03 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Emacs and GFortran
References: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0610311640410.16142-100000@ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it> <E1GfJ99-0001aR-3M@fencepost.gnu.org> <200611011037.12356.wt@atmos.colostate.edu> <20061101180354.GA62686@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20061101203931.E775C4401A@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> <20061101213056.GA63890@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20061101215142.51A0944013@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> <20061101223548.GA72295@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20061101224912.ED10144013@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> <20061101232634.GA44475@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Reply-to: ams at gnu dot org

If you wish to make gfortran 100% conformant with the GNU style, by
all means please do, but the suggested patch fixes the most common
case.  Could you please apply it?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Steve Kargl

References:
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Richard Stallman
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Warren Turkal
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Alfred M. Szmidt
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Alfred M. Szmidt
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Alfred M. Szmidt
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]