This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Emacs and GFortran

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
Cc: Angelo dot Graziosi at roma1 dot infn dot it, rms at gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, emacs-devel at gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:07:16 +0200
Subject: Re: Emacs and GFortran
References: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0610301122450.28710-100000@ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it> <E1Geccz-0006ZL-E4@fencepost.gnu.org> <20061030211304.GB7761@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <ubqnt6r7p.fsf@gnu.org> <20061031043156.GA10721@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:31:56 -0800
> From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
> Cc: Angelo.Graziosi@roma1.infn.it, rms@gnu.org, fortran@gcc.gnu.org,
> 	emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 06:31:54AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > If you still think this will hamper GFortran, please show some
> > specific examples of what your format allows, while the ``GNU
> > standard'' (in the meaning I mentioned above) does not.
> 
> UTSL

What for? so you'd reject it flat?

References:
- Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Angelo Graziosi
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Richard Stallman
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]