This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Emacs and GFortran

From: Miles Bader <miles dot bader at necel dot com>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
Cc: Richard Stallman <rms at gnu dot org>, Angelo Graziosi <Angelo dot Graziosi at roma1 dot infn dot it>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, emacs-devel at gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:02:26 +0900
Subject: Re: Emacs and GFortran
References: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0610301122450.28710-100000@ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it> <E1Geccz-0006ZL-E4@fencepost.gnu.org> <20061030211304.GB7761@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Reply-to: Miles Bader <miles at gnu dot org>

Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> writes:
> I disagree.  Gfortran's error mechanism can span multiple lines.
> The GNU form can't.

It is _not_ being suggested that all the gfortan error info be replaced
with something worse.

It is simply being requested that any information which has a "standard"
form be presented in (at least) that way -- additional information for
humans is of course good too, and can remain in the current format.

-Miles

-- 
The car has become... an article of dress without which we feel uncertain,
unclad, and incomplete.  [Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media, 1964]

References:
- Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Angelo Graziosi
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Richard Stallman
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]