This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: Emacs and GFortran
- From: Bud Davis <bdavis9659 at sbcglobal dot net>
- To: "François-Xavier" Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:37:36 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: Emacs and GFortran
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=v+EWMf4k894xwlO+uzkci1T14qL9gKZDLhl3Jx1Dn7zqAmDD6Bu6klslVju2/bITyOVGPukW0S6zed/Ev6nL2LvJTQBIR9I4tnyU88y2seSGqFGAE0Vwub6cA/oNNw0GQRXIO6LAjWRqe0Bmto2hrgx+lUDvzD+8PxT+mX8TMVg= ;
--- François-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > i think we should change. it is not just
> emacs...vi
> > has a similar function (which i can never
> remember..)
>
> I think the current error message format is possible
> to parse, so it's
> just that people who want to parse it have to write
> the appropriate
> code.
>
> Frankly, I strongly prefer the current error
> formating.
>
> FX
>
after reading the vim information on this feature, i
retract my previous concurrance. our output format is
parseable and at least vi easily supports it.
--bud