This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [gfortran,patch] Fix intrinsics used as actual arguments

From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
To: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
Cc: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>, Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>, "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org List" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, patch patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:23:27 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [gfortran,patch] Fix intrinsics used as actual arguments
References: <512904CE-093E-4252-8CDC-F818F1FF512A@gmail.com> <19c433eb0610130136y14419169w4a5e784524bfe540@mail.gmail.com> <20061015191313.GA10898@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <B400430E-1E32-4A61-8636-7F783E7EA794@gmail.com> <45369E4D.3040103@wanadoo.fr>

On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Paul Thomas wrote:
> With branching so imminent it seems utterly pointless to fret about
> it.  I stopped backporting a couple of weeks ago. After all, if 4.1
> is identical to 4.2, what is the point of releases?

Well, even if the Fortran frontend were identical, other parts 
(also relevant to Fortran) such as backends would be improved
over what's in 4.1. ;-)

Gerald

References:
- [gfortran,patch] Fix intrinsics used as actual arguments
  - From: FX Coudert
- Re: [gfortran,patch] Fix intrinsics used as actual arguments
  - From: François-Xavier Coudert
- Re: [gfortran,patch] Fix intrinsics used as actual arguments
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: [gfortran,patch] Fix intrinsics used as actual arguments
  - From: FX Coudert
- Re: [gfortran,patch] Fix intrinsics used as actual arguments
  - From: Paul Thomas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]