This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: spurious warning about uninitialized variable in implied do loop with -O1 option
- From: "François-Xavier Coudert" <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
- To: "Vivek Rao" <vivekrao4 at yahoo dot com>
- Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:07:15 +0200
- Subject: Re: spurious warning about uninitialized variable in implied do loop with -O1 option
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jclkp4C1F7jEzzxot7A+jFP6P1T900IYUIrx35WmgGS7oD0W6ef1PXTteSByJyBCd0oXshxN/cXkJ2jEu1z/K3j5Dqz24S/Pt/lX6AfXbtnJ7NFbW5Xzj6dLSyOyy6cjm9PSTyFvswbU9xt8Xoxx3pOneT1JmnkcHQ47Cvd7KlE=
- References: <20061011193619.GB21223@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20061013133622.16483.qmail@web53407.mail.yahoo.com>
Hi Vivek,
ximplied_do_gfortran.f90: In function 'nsum':
ximplied_do_gfortran.f90:5: warning: 'i' is used
uninitialized in this function
I filed this as PR29458. I appreciate your great feedback that helps
us increase gfortran's quality, but I wondered if you had considered
filing them into bugzilla. It really doesn't take longer than sending
us a mail (except the first time) and it allows us to spend more time
actually fixing bugs.
But, in any case, thanks for the reports!
FX