This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: F2003 features (was: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR20541 - allocatable components (TR15541))

From: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
To: Craig Powers <enigma at hal-pc dot org>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 06:50:45 +0200
Subject: Re: F2003 features (was: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR20541 - allocatable components (TR15541))
References: <1160378390.3719.3.camel@localhost> <452A80D5.70408@net-b.de> <452AE0C0.5050201@hal-pc.org>

Dear All,

I have said this before and I will probably say this again; before we launch into any more F200x projects, we must make a determined effort to get F95 right, Gfortran is still much too buggy in quite fundamental things, as the batch of PRs that have been added in the last 48hours show.

My vote would be to scrub all extension projects (including sub-modules!) and to embark on an effort to get the basics right.

I started a triage of the fortran PRs, which I now propose to complete and post to the wiki.

Paul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: F2003 features (was: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR20541 - allocatable components (TR15541))
  - From: Warren Turkal
- Re: F2003 features (was: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR20541 - allocatable components (TR15541))
  - From: Steve Kargl

References:
- F2003 features (was: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR20541 - allocatable components (TR15541))
  - From: Salvatore Filippone
- Re: F2003 features (was: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR20541 - allocatable components (TR15541))
  - From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: F2003 features (was: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR20541 - allocatable components (TR15541))
  - From: Craig Powers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]