This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [gfortran,patch] Fix intrinsics used as actual arguments

From: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org List" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 21:09:11 +0200
Subject: Re: [gfortran,patch] Fix intrinsics used as actual arguments
References: <512904CE-093E-4252-8CDC-F818F1FF512A@gmail.com> <200610081938.06406.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <5F0BF78A-F55F-4626-9E55-6BE9DE2B1CEF@gmail.com> <200610082057.25376.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>

Looks like you didn't synchronize your tree before commiting: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/libgfortran/Makefile.in? r1=117560&r2=117559&pathrev=117560

No, I did! It looks like Paul didn't commit his Makefile.am change:

http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/libgfortran/Makefile.am?view=log

No mention there of the addition of move_alloc. I've commited the Makefile.am patch to add it, as well as the regenerated Makefile.in, and sent a message to Paul so that he can check nothing else was forgotten in the process.

So, hum, is it working now?

FX

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [gfortran,patch] Fix intrinsics used as actual arguments
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- [gfortran,patch] Fix intrinsics used as actual arguments
  - From: FX Coudert
- Re: [gfortran,patch] Fix intrinsics used as actual arguments
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [gfortran,patch] Fix intrinsics used as actual arguments
  - From: FX Coudert
- Re: [gfortran,patch] Fix intrinsics used as actual arguments
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]