This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR20779 and PR20891 - allocation of STAT or specification variables in same call
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: THOMAS Paul Richard 169137 <Paul dot Richard dot THOMAS at cea dot fr>
- Cc: grigory_zagorodnev at linux dot intel dot com, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 07:09:58 -0700
- Subject: Re: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR20779 and PR20891 - allocation of STAT or specification variables in same call
- References: <1299EF3181B10F479D85C3280132852435AF6D@THEZE.intra.cea.fr> <1299EF3181B10F479D85C3280132852435AF70@THEZE.intra.cea.fr>
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 01:39:28PM +0200, THOMAS Paul Richard 169137 wrote:
> Grigory,
> >
> > Thanks - I do not think that I have time to fix this, right
> > now. Unless I see something
> > quickly, I'll revert the patch tonight. I'll put your
> > testcase in the PR20779 directory
> > with a DO_NOT_FORGET.ME
>
> I have converted it to a TODO - the enclosed patch excludes
> looking for derived types in the allocation specification expression,
> thereby fixing your problem.
>
> I propose to apply this rather than revert. I will make a testcase
> of your example, submit a PR and fix it tonight.
>
> Is that acceptable to everybody?
>
Yes.
--
Steve