This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: What's the standard way of referring to gfortran in the manual?
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: Brooks Moses <bmoses at stanford dot edu>
- Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:05:01 -0700
- Subject: Re: What's the standard way of referring to gfortran in the manual?
- References: <451EF4F8.1050403@stanford.edu>
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 03:51:36PM -0700, Brooks Moses wrote:
>
> (1) @code{gfortran} should be used for references to the program name as
> entered on the command line, and only for those references.
>
> (2) Only one of the following names should be used consistently
> throughout the documentation to refer to the compiler. I've listed them
> in my order of preference:
>
> (2a) "GNU Fortran"
>
I think we should be consistent, and I think the above choices
are what we should use.
You're seeing the effects of multiple authors in the manual. :)
--
Steve