This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: reference implementation of BLAS

From: Warren Turkal <wt at atmos dot colostate dot edu>
To: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:02:36 -0600
Subject: Re: reference implementation of BLAS
References: <200609211111.49548.wt@atmos.colostate.edu> <20060925002932.GB49550@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <200609251109.44032.wt@atmos.colostate.edu>

On Monday 25 September 2006 11:09, Warren Turkal wrote:
> To my knowledge, I am not using -ffast-math. In fact, I shouldn't be using
> any optimization options on the compile. I just looked at the ouput.txt I
> published, and it doesn't have the strings "fast" and "-O" in it anywhere.

This thread seems to have just ended. Does anyone have any ideas for getting 
the CBLAS test to pass? I mean, it seems that gcc 4.1 is losing precision. I 
just don't have any idea how to start troubleshooting this problem.

wt
-- 
Warren Turkal, Research Associate III/Systems Administrator
Colorado State University, Dept. of Atmospheric Science

Follow-Ups:
- Re: reference implementation of BLAS
  - From: Steve Kargl

References:
- reference implementation of BLAS
  - From: Warren Turkal
- Re: reference implementation of BLAS
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: reference implementation of BLAS
  - From: Warren Turkal

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]