This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR28585: Add Fortran 2003 NEW_LINE intrinsic function

From: Brooks Moses <bmoses at stanford dot edu>
To: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:18:44 -0700
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR28585: Add Fortran 2003 NEW_LINE intrinsic function
Organization: Stanford University
References: <4504A704.70502@net-b.de> <450F010F.6080701@net-b.de> <451AFCC8.4060602@net-b.de>

Tobias Burnus wrote:

* PING *

Tobias Burnus wrote on 18 September:
Tobias Burnus wrote on 2006-09-11:
The new_line implementation is based on achar, I hope thus that it is simple enough
that it can be committed while I wait for the reply from
assign@gnu.org.
(Still no (e)mail regarding the copyright assignment)
(I received, signed and reposted the letter last Saturday.)

For what it's worth, I believe that the standard gcc rule of thumb on what can be allowed without a copyright assignment is 10 lines. (In any case, the idea is that what's allowed are only things that contain insufficient new work to be copyrighted.) This looks to be notably larger than that.

- Brooks

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR28585: Add Fortran 2003 NEW_LINE intrinsic function
  - From: Steve Kargl

References:
- [Patch, fortran] PR28585: Add Fortran 2003 NEW_LINE intrinsic function
  - From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR28585: Add Fortran 2003 NEW_LINE intrinsic function
  - From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR28585: Add Fortran 2003 NEW_LINE intrinsic function
  - From: Tobias Burnus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]