This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: Is GFortran stable enough to actually use?
- From: "Christopher D. Rickett" <crickett at lanl dot gov>
- To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- Cc: Joe Krahn <krahn at niehs dot nih dot gov>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, rasmussn at lanl dot gov
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:26:09 -0600 (MDT)
- Subject: Re: Is GFortran stable enough to actually use?
- References: <44B7B09F.8070700@niehs.nih.gov> <20060714152033.GA34309@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <44B801F5.7040009@niehs.nih.gov> <20060714210702.GB6979@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <55582.128.165.0.81.1152918647.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> <20060913210140.GA85842@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Hi Steve,
yes, i do have an update. the paperwork was mailed to the FSF last week
and we are waiting to see if the FSF person in contact with us needed
anything else. i would like to get what i have done out the door next
week if possible. is that soon enough?
Thanks.
Chris
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 05:10:47PM -0600, Christopher D. Rickett wrote:
> >
> > > Not counting the usual bugs, TR15581 is one of three
> > > outstanding warts. The others are ISO_C_BINDING and
> > > the IEEE754 modules. A patch for ISO_C_BINDING has been
> > > developed by Christopher Rxxx (sorry Chris I've forgotten
> > > your surname), and he is going through the FSF paperwork
> > > procedure.
> >
> > i did finally receive the paperwork and i hope it will be done soon.
> >
> > Chris
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Any news on the ISO_C_BINDING front? As you probably know we are
> running against the branching for the 4.2.0 release. It would be
> nice if we could manage to get a preview into 4.2.
>
> --
> Steve
>