This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: Is GFortran stable enough to actually use?
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: "Christopher D. Rickett" <crickett at lanl dot gov>
- Cc: Joe Krahn <krahn at niehs dot nih dot gov>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:01:40 -0700
- Subject: Re: Is GFortran stable enough to actually use?
- References: <44B7B09F.8070700@niehs.nih.gov> <20060714152033.GA34309@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <44B801F5.7040009@niehs.nih.gov> <20060714210702.GB6979@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <55582.128.165.0.81.1152918647.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov>
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 05:10:47PM -0600, Christopher D. Rickett wrote:
>
> > Not counting the usual bugs, TR15581 is one of three
> > outstanding warts. The others are ISO_C_BINDING and
> > the IEEE754 modules. A patch for ISO_C_BINDING has been
> > developed by Christopher Rxxx (sorry Chris I've forgotten
> > your surname), and he is going through the FSF paperwork
> > procedure.
>
> i did finally receive the paperwork and i hope it will be done soon.
>
> Chris
Hi Chris,
Any news on the ISO_C_BINDING front? As you probably know we are
running against the branching for the 4.2.0 release. It would be
nice if we could manage to get a preview into 4.2.
--
Steve