This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Hi!Surely, you could present an example, with sufficient specificity on your target platform, versions, etc. to make an answer possible. Did you look up the options -finline-functions, -finline-functions-called-once, -fkeep-inline-functions, and relate them to your examples?
I've just run a benchmark of sorts and found out that GFortran is holding its ground nicely against other compilers (this has been reported several times, but I wanted to see it in a very self-centered way...).
Nevertheless I'm wondering about something: I take it that little (if any) 'interprocedural analysis' is performed, I don't even seem to be able to have any procedures manually inlined (though I would read the manual as it were possioble): am I doing it wrong? if not, is it a feature of GCC?, or a case of GFortran not getting through to the next GCC stage?
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |