On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 01:06:54AM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Monday 31 July 2006 00:54, Michael Paton wrote:
> > I've just run across the effects of this in the 20060729 snapshot, where
> > previously working code got runtime errors. It seems that Jerry's patch
> > makes it an error to attempt to CLOSE a unit which has not been OPENED, or
> > "associated". My reading of the f77 standard and a late draft of the 2003
> > standard show this to be explicitly permitted.
>
> Do you have a pointer to a paragraph in the standard?
>
F95 standard, Section 9.3.5, page 143, lines 6 an 7.
Execution of a CLOSE statement specify a unit that does not
exit or has no file connected to it is permitted and affects
no file.
F2003 has the exact same text. Seems we have a regression.