This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 03:13:01PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:I am curious if anyone has run a spectral test on these or is that necessary?Thomas, My initial test with the change of...
--- random-patch-4.diff.org 2006-07-30 15:10:22.000000000 -0400 +++ random-patch-4.diff 2006-07-30 15:10:58.000000000 -0400 @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ +#ifdef HAVE_GFC_REAL_16 + +void -+random_r16 (GFC_REAL_10 *x) ++random_r16 (GFC_REAL_16 *x) +{ + GFC_UINTEGER_8 kiss1, kiss2; +
seems to work. The random_3.f90 test executes without complaint when the
static libgfortran is linked in. I'll do a complete build and make check
shortly. Do you have any other test programs that I can run to check the
changes in your patch other than random_3.f90?
Jack
Jack, see the attached program. Change the definition of ep to ep=kind(1.e0_16). You may want to change n.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |