This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: more new test failures on Darwin
- From: "François-Xavier Coudert" <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
- To: "Jack Howarth" <howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu>
- Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:30:32 +0200
- Subject: Re: more new test failures on Darwin
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LBfq7H1dMb7Yk5Pc3UWYhXqUIJ8eavK79vlVEdPJFdfBZadCe4rvgQiJsY5PHnI8KxbjgkjM5eawIh2s/TV1z8gSLM9iJz0QYUhvFuCt/mEJknQ2lkdNGiZYagdYldnIfr5q+EWBFLEJGFMshYmNzDbcFg+oZ9tQ7IMdH0VHI3Q=
- References: <20060727112758.0F8F71000D@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>
Last nights svn pull has accumulated another set of gfortran
test failures on MacOS X 10.4...
The gfortran.dg/stat_?.f90 testcases were introduced with yesterday's
LSTAT patch.
I can't reproduce the failures by manually compiling and executing these
tests.
Hum... what does the testsuite log say?
($builddir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.log, look for "stat_1")
FX