This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: new gfortran failures on MacOS X

From: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at verizon dot net>
To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
Cc: howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu, Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:54:13 -0700
Subject: Re: new gfortran failures on MacOS X
References: <20060724233423.D97ED1000D@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> <200607250105.k6P15x828934@makai.watson.ibm.com>

David Edelsohn wrote:

I am seeing a new set of failures in the gfortran testsuite on
a MacOS X 10.4 build of gcc trunk from last night.

I see them on AIX as well:

At line 12 of file .../testsuite/gfortran.dg/direct_io_6.f90
Fortran runtime error: Invalid argument

David

I just committed direct_io_6.f90 last night as part of the large file support. Since this touches on libgfortran/io.h, it may be necessary to do a clean bootstrap. There is a pr out for dependencies not working right with io.h. In other words, make does not recompile everything in libgfortran/io when io.h changes.

Either that or ???

Jerry

Follow-Ups:
- Re: new gfortran failures on MacOS X
  - From: David Edelsohn

References:
- new gfortran failures on MacOS X
  - From: Jack Howarth
- Re: new gfortran failures on MacOS X
  - From: David Edelsohn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]