This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH,committed] fortran/28439 -- Fix arithmetic if

From: Brooks Moses <bmoses at stanford dot edu>
To: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:12:06 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH,committed] fortran/28439 -- Fix arithmetic if
Organization: Stanford University
References: <20060722175552.GA98967@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <44C2A22F.3030506@gmail.com> <20060724165455.GA14250@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

Steve Kargl wrote:

I've committed a testcase as requested by FX.

[...]

   if (myfunc(0)) 10, 20, 30  ! Should go to 10
10 call abort
20 call abort

30 if (myfunc(0)) 40, 50, 60  ! Should go to 20
40 call abort
60 call abort

50 if (myfunc(0)) 70, 80, 90  ! Should go to 30
80 call abort
90 call abort

70 continue

I think the line numbers in the comments are from an old version of the testcase. The correct values now should be 30, 50, and 70, yes?

- Brooks

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH,committed] fortran/28439 -- Fix arithmetic if
  - From: Steve Kargl

References:
- [PATCH,committed] fortran/28439 -- Fix arithmetic if
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: [PATCH,committed] fortran/28439 -- Fix arithmetic if
  - From: FX Coudert
- Re: [PATCH,committed] fortran/28439 -- Fix arithmetic if
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]