This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [gfortran,patch] Correct bounds-checking for FORALL, WHERE and other intrinsics

From: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
To: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
Cc: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, patch <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 19:15:38 +0200
Subject: Re: [gfortran,patch] Correct bounds-checking for FORALL, WHERE and other intrinsics
References: <19c433eb0607050636mc55b70cj8272c21a032937ad@mail.gmail.com> <44AC9CD4.2050903@wanadoo.fr>

>> With this patch, we're

finally able to execute all the gfortran testsuite with -fbounds-check
enabled!
Great! Does that constitute the test or will we see some testcases?

I usually don't add testcases with an explicit { dg-options "-fbounds-check" }. The goal is to have a testsuite that runs entirely with -fbounds-check, so that when someone wants to regtest a patch involving bounds-checking, he can simply run the testsuite with the option.

I'm considering including explicit tests for cases where bounds-checking is performed and expected to fail. I'll send a batch of those (stacked on my hard drive) when I find a way to do that with dejagnu :)

FX

References:
- [gfortran,patch] Correct bounds-checking for FORALL, WHERE and other intrinsics
  - From: François-Xavier Coudert
- Re: [gfortran,patch] Correct bounds-checking for FORALL, WHERE and other intrinsics
  - From: Paul Thomas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]