This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: intrinsic functions not yet documented
- From: Daniel Franke <franke dot daniel at gmail dot com>
- To: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 00:13:20 +0200
- Subject: Re: intrinsic functions not yet documented
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=WrWZEy67fdMMCOG4vokslODpkLl3Ehppds14b7Bk3kykxGuWkxAAQazVy2WE0E2aW+vrzsqpLBj9gD6WvlX9R3SEm0oT1/m3GnBQ0IzNIub42tfQtsqx+xjvGEbnuwjHzPV2DCo1PdJuFVF0oGsuSnme54UuhTOem80C5xXPI0E=
- References: <200607040009.57134.franke.daniel@gmail.com> <200607042322.18685.franke.daniel@gmail.com> <44AADE73.3030107@gmail.com>
> By the way, I think it might be worth replacing the "option" section
> ("f95" or "gnu" or both) by a "Standards" section, which could state
> "new in F95", "F77, F95 and F2003", "new in F2003", "GNU extension" or
> things like that. Do you like the idea?
Yes, I do.
Maybe, this could be extended to a "timeline like" approach, e. g.
"not available in F77, new in F95, available in F2003"
+-------+-------+-------+-----+
| F77 | F95 | F2003 | ... |
+-------+-------+-------+-----+
| N/A | std | std | |
+-------+-------+-------+-----+
"available in F77 and F95 standards, obsolete in F2003, removed from future
versions"
+-------+-------+-------+-----+
| F77 | F95 | F2003 | ... |
+-------+-------+-------+-----+
| std | std | obs | N/A |
+-------+-------+-------+-----+
"GNU extension, available for F95 and F2003, not F77"
+-------+-------+-------+-----+
| F77 | F95 | F2003 | ... |
+-------+-------+-------+-----+
| N/A | GNU | GNU | |
+-------+-------+-------+-----+