Re: [Patch, fortran] PR24558, PR20877 and PR25047 - module function alternate entries.

[Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>]

tobi,

> Thanks for the explanation.  The patch is ok, but I would welcome a  
> comment in a strategically chosen place (resolve_entries is probably  
> the right place).  

You are entirely welcome.  I'll do a double, cross-referenced comment; 
one in get_proc_name and the other in resolve_entries.

> Oh, and don't forget about that redundant if :-)

Hah! As you know, once the penny dropped, I did it right away and 
regtested it too.

> - Tobi
Many thanks, sir.  I might not be able to do the commit until Monday 
morning but I'll see what can be done first thing tomorrow.

Best regards

Paul

PS PR16206 has succumbed - I will submit a patch around the middle of 
next week.