This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR27613 - Recursive functions


On May 23, 2006, at 8:53 AM, Paul Thomas wrote:

Richard,

You might run into people wanting some cases of the nonstandard forms as an extension. As you know, I'm not generally a big fan of many extensions, but I'll stay out of that aspect. As extensions go, I don't consider that one particularly "bad". I just wanted to clarify which cases are standard-conforming, and which ones are extensions. (And if you do allow the extension, I'd argue strongly for diagnosing it when diagnosis of extensions is asked for. It seems like this one should be easy to diagnose in such a way).

Absolutely. Maybe a warning in all circumstances?

I would.


--
Richard Maine                |  Good judgment comes from experience;
Richard.Maine@nasa.gov       |  experience comes from bad judgment.
                            |        -- Mark Twain


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]