This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
new gfortran 4.1 branch failures
- From: howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu (Jack Howarth)
- To: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:27:35 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: new gfortran 4.1 branch failures
A build of yesterdays svn pull of gcc 4.1 branch seems to be showing
new failures in the gfortran testsuite on MacOS X 10.4. Specifically,
the following failures appear to be new.
FAIL: gfortran.dg/secnds.f -Os execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/transpose_reshape_r10.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
WARNING: gfortran.dg/transpose_reshape_r10.f90 -O0 compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: gfortran.dg/transpose_reshape_r10.f90 -O1 (test for excess errors)
WARNING: gfortran.dg/transpose_reshape_r10.f90 -O1 compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: gfortran.dg/transpose_reshape_r10.f90 -O2 (test for excess errors)
WARNING: gfortran.dg/transpose_reshape_r10.f90 -O2 compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: gfortran.dg/transpose_reshape_r10.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (test for excess errors)
WARNING: gfortran.dg/transpose_reshape_r10.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: gfortran.dg/transpose_reshape_r10.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops (test for excess errors)
WARNING: gfortran.dg/transpose_reshape_r10.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: gfortran.dg/transpose_reshape_r10.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions (test for excess errors)
WARNING: gfortran.dg/transpose_reshape_r10.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: gfortran.dg/transpose_reshape_r10.f90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
WARNING: gfortran.dg/transpose_reshape_r10.f90 -O3 -g compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: gfortran.dg/transpose_reshape_r10.f90 -Os (test for excess errors)
WARNING: gfortran.dg/transpose_reshape_r10.f90 -Os compilation failed to produce executable
Are these really expected now?
Jack