This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: Segmentation fault in openmp simple routine from libgomp testsuite.
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:14:12 -0500
- Subject: Re: Segmentation fault in openmp simple routine from libgomp testsuite.
- References: <200602280858.23231.benjamin.reveille@gmail.com> <19c433eb0602280508k6c1ef204x645c1fc263fa77eb@mail.gmail.com> <9e363c0d0602280813y54cee9ebk392dc2b195fd9b7a@mail.gmail.com> <9e363c0d0602280815r33761e56l681b8567730e8a9b@mail.gmail.com> <d0602e7eba0bd4d0884d935e145b4f3a@gmail.com> <440DC40D.1010903@redhat.com> <20060307191559.GA3652@redhat.com> <f9d168d2cbf66790661581b679af021e@gmail.com> <4e924a2c0e1966fe924de2c6700a5faa@physics.uc.edu>
On Mar 7, 2006, at 6:31 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
I bet the same issue now will happen with libstdc++ (and in 4.1.0 in
fact).
I want to say the weak references is the wrong way of doing things for
non
shared libraries.
And it turned out I was correct in saying libstdc++ is also effected.
See PR 26633. So this is not a libfortran specific issue any more.
Adding Alexandre to the CC since it was his weak reference patch which
caused this regression for libstdc++.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski