This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [Patch, fortran] Inline DOT_PRODUCT
- From: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: "THOMAS Paul Richard 169137" <paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr>
- Cc: paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:29:31 +0100
- Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] Inline DOT_PRODUCT
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LLNotET6iV1aI8GaRtIHQ6tglSmZigFfy+frqLfziikgphXTksA3bSdVAph38VMQoA/IS3CXXeW6O0lme5u5VZ45W/nonNiI6wBMOgXRtBVeaQTC4abVNeocpYsqsh70/+n/oyzaTyVgoy9RFtsZTrwnssoM7/8dIba758W4DZ4=
- References: <756DFD3DE8F1D411A59A00306E06E84702C42A05@drfccad.cad.cea.fr>
On 2/27/06, THOMAS Paul Richard 169137 <paul.richard.thomas@cea.fr> wrote:
> Paolo,
> >
> > > Have you tested -ftree-vectorize?
> >
> > No, I haven't and I should. I will report back tonight.
> >
>
> It makes no difference whatsoever - should I be changing the TREEery to benefit from it?
I think the patch is fine as it is. Vectorization capabilities can be
investigated
later or maybe vector types emitted directly(?).
Richard.