This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: PR26409 - regression in respect of contained procedures.
- From: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
- To: Brooks Moses <bmoses at stanford dot edu>
- Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 21:56:19 +0100
- Subject: Re: PR26409 - regression in respect of contained procedures.
- References: <43FF09FC.8000805@wanadoo.fr> <43FF52C7.2090703@stanford.edu>
Brooks Moses wrote:
Paul Thomas wrote:
Erik Edelmann has found by binary search that the patch below is
responsible for the above PR/regression. I can confirm that this is
the case. Since I triggered HJ into writing this patch, I will take
responsibility for it and will revert resolve.c for the time being.
Obviously there is some subtle difference in the order or number of
visits to each function. I will see if I can understand what is going
on.
Paul, unless I'm missing something, you've neglected to include the
"patch below"! :)
patch_below = NULL(patch), or something.
It was: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg00796.html
In fact, I apologise to HJ for being somewhat high-handed in eliminating
it but the regression was, in my opinion, severe enough to warrant such
an action.
Cheers
Paul