This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Bug libfortran/26423][4.1/4.2 Regression] Error on binary I/O for large array

From: Janne Blomqvist <jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi>
To: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at verizon dot net>
Cc: Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:59:01 +0200
Subject: Re: [Bug libfortran/26423][4.1/4.2 Regression] Error on binary I/O for large array
References: <43FDC8CF.1070304@verizon.net> <43FF1E89.6020704@verizon.net>

On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 06:56:09AM -0800, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> The attached patch fixes this regression.  It is a revert of changes made 
> to unix.c in patch for PR25949.  Bootstrapped, regtested, NIST tested, 
> tested with the test case attached.
> 
> OK for 4.2?
> 
> Mark can you get this into 4.1 before release?

Ok for trunk, and 4.1 as well if Mark approves.

Perhaps name the testcase read_many_1.f instead.

I think it's a bit of a shame to reintroduce the superfluous lseek:s,
but clearly correctness and getting this into 4.1 ASAP is more
important than such a petty detail.

-- 
Janne Blomqvist

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- [Bug libfortran/26423][4.1/4.2 Regression] Error on binary I/O for large array
  - From: Jerry DeLisle
- Re: [Bug libfortran/26423][4.1/4.2 Regression] Error on binary I/O for large array
  - From: Jerry DeLisle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]