This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: Polyhedron shootout between g95 and gfortran
- From: "François-Xavier Coudert" <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
- To: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:45:21 +0100
- Subject: Re: Polyhedron shootout between g95 and gfortran
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UgAnImufZEbFcjZwTF49tB3cXU8bJdxlOFxIStyw7OLwuZ1ZQ9HvjMA56ZQkZj28m8rGGn1XZvJR4WP0fFuwCRZmKyg7IMjDpSGDfFDfJkjg7xieNVsZw8Crym6LACobPAGA5aKe02TE4xUu1VRL8TO9XEqrvReLwiozAGuU00w=
- References: <43FCEE30.mailH9C11EVO4@tournesol.lps.ens.fr> <43FCF92F.308@wanadoo.fr> <43FD8C04.mail6PI11S1CC@tournesol.lps.ens.fr>
I was just thinking about the dot_product timings issues (and the
cross-over problem), and I can't think of a fundamental reason why we
couldn't have all the speed of the library in an inline version? (at
the cost of adding maybe a little extra info to help the optimizer)
FX