This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [Committed] PR19543: Check modes in varasm.c:compare_constant
- From: "François-Xavier Coudert" <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
- To: "Roger Sayle" <roger at eyesopen dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:16:01 +0100
- Subject: Re: [Committed] PR19543: Check modes in varasm.c:compare_constant
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GuRTCda+BpDgxrHOiVC/HNqgZo4/SojZfJRu6IaR/2u1957eu+75T/6uIw4+C5+QPV/tdTEErUuKZp72orA7sCOp1EGdqKd245F5WLtTBgjYMBaHBbUB9iyKixTP1nTm3GoKkiIbAO8gSeFUUKMLSmlJ1wEgakjZjQjo8gsZhS8=
- References: <52ad2bca755393108f14e6f4770f9f22@gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0602200857230.20488-100000@www.eyesopen.com>
> Is there an interest from
> the fortran folks in getting this (admittedly very safe) patch
> into 4.1.1? If not, we can close both 19543 and 20066.
I closed 20066 as a duplicate (merely another consequence of the same
problem). I think we should get that patch into 4.1.1, although it's
not a regression properly speaking: the rules for Fortran are a bit
less stringent than they are for the rest of gcc, and while this is
not inside the front-end, it seems very safe.
FX