This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: host association question..

From: "Christopher D. Rickett" <crickett at lanl dot gov>
To: Richard E Maine <Richard dot Maine at nasa dot gov>
Cc: Erik Edelmann <erik dot edelmann at iki dot fi>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, crasmussen at lanl dot gov
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:46:38 -0700 (MST)
Subject: Re: host association question..
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0602151505390.9408@lennox.lanl.gov> <20060216122110.GA21199@acclab.helsinki.fi> <24a756ca05839f4f520b53df84148873@nasa.gov>

> 
> P.S. Your terminology had me puzzled for a while. Of course you can declare
> procedure variables in an interface block!Declaring procedures is mostly what
> interface blocks are about. But the only kind of procedure variables in f95
> are dummy arguments. This didn't seem to match the code in question, though,
> so I eventually figured out that you were talking about local variables *IN* a
> procedure instead of procedure variables. (A procedure variable is a variable
> that is a procedure - i.e. a procedure dummy argument or procedure pointer).

i apologize for the terminology; i'll try to be more clear.  right now i'm
having *fun* with procedure variables for gfortran.

Chris

References:
- host association question..
  - From: Christopher D. Rickett
- Re: host association question..
  - From: Erik Edelmann
- Re: host association question..
  - From: Richard E Maine

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]