This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [gfortran, committed] Fix regressions introduced by patch for PR 25045
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: Toon Moene <moene at knmi dot nl>
- Cc: Tobias dot Schlueter at Physik dot Uni-Muenchen dot DE, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, thomas dot koeni at online dot de
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:19:50 -0800
- Subject: Re: [gfortran, committed] Fix regressions introduced by patch for PR 25045
- References: <43F31539.2020202@knmi.nl>
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 11:49:13AM +0000, Toon Moene wrote:
> Tobias wrote:
>
> > I committed the following under the obviously correct rule.
>
> And now the obvious question: How could this ever have been committed -
> this cannot have passed make -k check on any architecture known to man
> (errr, gcc) ?
>
Well, I recall reviewing that patch. My reviews consist in
bootstraps and regression tests. It must have passed the
testing on i386-*-freebsd and/or amd64-*-freebsd.
--
Steve