This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: The future of gfortran maintenance.
- From: bud davis <bdavis9659 at sbcglobal dot net>
- To: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:53:04 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: The future of gfortran maintenance.
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=NovGWcdXaQj1pQx76SWV/v3sKuTZI1SzPhhVfysD0xBigyLiCRuhs7rEO1N+tweFnFvEuxit++Z76zSYRpmfaFo/7zLRBU+sn9dtzLgBEyhReB+fXXvQKb0XlVJcflZCFHUOEX0JLWaJceqFBPVPxaTuQxCK55FWE9Ms6I+Wmx0= ;
Toon Moene wrote:
> I think our group has a healthy attitude towards
peer review, and
> this won't be our stumbling block. The SC was
concerned more about
> dealing with a dozen - equal - people when
addressing the Fortran
> maintainership. There's always an - admittedly
small - chance that
> we encounter an issue on which we get thoroughly
divided.
>
> My counter to that argument was that I still have to
see it happen,
> and in case it happens, I feel it's my
responsibility as an SC member
> to find a resolution.
Things have worked out rather well in the past year,
and i think the
'reviewer' policy really increased the rate of
positive change in the
code base.
I guess it is time for me to get to work on
gfortran.....having been
gone for an extended absence.
--bud davis