This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [patch] testcase for named control statements
- From: Bernhard Fischer <rep dot nop at aon dot at>
- To: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
- Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:07:50 +0100
- Subject: Re: [patch] testcase for named control statements
- References: <20060113215534.GC19998@aon.at> <43D7F92D.5040206@physik.uni-muenchen.de>
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 11:18:21PM +0100, Tobias Schlüter wrote:
>Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>> Ok for mainline and 4.1, with the name do_2.f90?
>>
>> 2006-01-13 Bernhard Fischer <aldot@gcc.gnu.org>
>>
>> * gfortran.dg/do_2.f90: New testcase for named do/if/case statements.
>
>You don't seem to have committed this. Please do so, and feel free to add
Brooks Moses requested changes and i didn't find the time to address
this yet.
Please feel free to check this in as file named_construct.f90 (per
kargl's request on irc) after having dealt with Brooks' comments.
This one: "
>+ band: do k=1,5
>+ if (j.eq.3) cycle conv
Is this really intended to be j, not k?
"
was really ment to be j, fwiw.
>more tests, if you find inadequatecies in the testsuite.
Here is another example which i think is valid but fails:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-01/msg00191.html
Unfortunately I didn't find the time to look at it further last
weekend, so it stands as is.