This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Questions about the gfortran test suite

From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr (Dominique Dhumieres)
To: tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:20:26 +0100
Subject: Re: Questions about the gfortran test suite
References: <43B10926.mailF7N1W277T@tournesol.lps.ens.fr> <43B137BA.1070801@physik.uni-muenchen.de>

Thanks for the quick answer.

> Curiously, this is different from the case of entries in functions, where the
> parentheses are only required if a result clause is present.

You are right, I have never paid attention to this point.

Note that the Intel extension was OK for me if detected by the
standard conformance flags.

Dominique

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Questions about the gfortran test suite
  - From: Tobias Schlüter

References:
- Questions about the gfortran test suite
  - From: Dominique Dhumieres
- Re: Questions about the gfortran test suite
  - From: Tobias Schlüter

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]