This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Assumed size arrays and min intrinsic ?!?!?

From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
To: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
Cc: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:00:13 -0800
Subject: Re: Assumed size arrays and min intrinsic ?!?!?
References: <E1Eptt9-0005T7-7t@laptop.moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <20051223233918.GA21946@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <43ACE604.1020400@wanadoo.fr>

On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 07:09:08AM +0100, Paul Thomas wrote:
>
> Guilty as charged; I will remove the assumed size test from the 
> intrinsics altogether. It obviously needs more work.
> 
> I am sorry about that.
> 

Nothing to be sorry about.  You squashed something like 20
bugs last week.  Introducing a minor regression is a price
I'm willing to accept. :-)

-- 
Steve

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Assumed size arrays and min intrinsic ?!?!?
  - From: Paul Thomas

References:
- Assumed size arrays and min intrinsic ?!?!?
  - From: Toon Moene
- Re: Assumed size arrays and min intrinsic ?!?!?
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: Assumed size arrays and min intrinsic ?!?!?
  - From: Paul Thomas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]