This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH,gfortran] Error or warning about nonstandard type declarations


On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 09:26:01PM -0800, Brooks Moses wrote:
> Steve Kargl wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 05:46:04AM +0100, Paul Thomas wrote:
> >>That all looks fine to me, apart from one issue - what was the F77 
> >>preferred form for non default kinds?  I thought that it was the * form?
> >
> >Nope.  Fortran 77 had REAL, DOUBLE PRECISION, and COMPLEX.
> >There was no DOUBLE COMPLEX nor the * forms.  I don't
> >have my copy of F77 in front of me, so I can't say what the
> >INTEGER and LOGICAL forms are, but I double they used *.
> 
> (I presume that's "doubt they used", not "double they used".  Funny how 
> the fingers think they know what word you've started and go off and do 
> their own thing, eh?)

It's the bear^H^Her ;-)

> For future reference, the FORTRAN 77 standard and MIL-STD 1753 
> extensions to it are online at the following two addresses, respectively:
>   http://www.fortran.com/fortran/F77_std/rjcnf.html
>   http://www.gre.ac.uk/~physica/mil/milspec.html

Looks like a gfortran wiki entry. (hint, hint).

I actually have pdf versions of both F66 and F77 on my non-Windows
system.

> >PS: I thought you went to bed.
> 
> That was seven hours ago.  I presume he was planning to wake up 
> afterwards!  :)
> 

Time sure flies.

-- 
Steve


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]